Close Contact Us Now
Tap Here To Call Us

Articles Posted in Business Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: What Makes a Market, a Market, Anyway? A Look at Social Media

Whether you bring a suit over a complicated product like a social media network or a simple tangible product, like an apple, a relevant product and geographic market must be defined properly to succeed. In the March 17, 2022 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward T. Kang wrote “What Makes…

Updated:

Trials PAC CLE: How to Navigate Multi-Party Litigation – the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Edward Kang serves as a panelist at the 2022 NAMWOLF Driving Diversity Leadership Conference along with Arnold Barba of LimNexus LLP, Suann Ingle of Suann Ingle Associates, Zahira Diaz-Vasquez of AT&T Services, Eric Nordstrom of Casualty Claims, and Jane Appleby of Advocate Auroro Health. Join the Trials Practice Area Committee…

Updated:

Kang Haggerty Earns National Rankings from U.S. News “Best Law Firms” 2022

Kang Haggerty LLC has once again received national recognition for its Construction Law practice in the U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” 2022. The firm appeared in the national rankings for both Construction Law and Litigation – Construction. The practice is led by Henry Donner. In addition, the firm was…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Qui Tam Suits and Veil Piercing: A Powerful Combo for Combating Health Care Fraud

This article will discuss briefly the history of qui tam litigation, its interplay with piercing theories and the particular utility of these types of suits in the health care context. In the November 4, 2021 edition of of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward T. Kang of Kang Haggerty co-authored “Qui Tam Suits…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Enterprise Liability and When to Seek Piercing the Corporate Veil

In this column, we discuss Mortimer, the enterprise theory of liability generally, and the common sequencing decisions plaintiffs need to make when bringing a veil piercing claim. In the September 9, 2021 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward T. Kang of Kang Haggerty co-authored “Enterprise Liability and When to Seek…

Updated:

Donner, Mathews, Kovalsky Recognized in 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©

Kang Haggerty LLC is pleased to announce that three of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2022. Congratulations to Henry J. Donner, Gregory H. Mathews and Kandis L. Kovalsky. Donner also received recognition as “Lawyer of the Year” in the practice of…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Protective Orders in the Age of E-Discovery

In the July 8, 2021 edition of The Legal Intelligencer Edward T. Kang of Kang Haggerty co-authored “Protective Orders in the Age of E-Discovery.” Electronic discovery and its transformational consequences have been a defining feature of 21st century litigation. The sheer proliferation of data and associated complexity has necessitated the…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: A Primer on Pennsylvania’s Participation Theory

In the June 24, 2021 edition of The Legal Intelligencer Edward T. Kang, managing member of Kang Haggerty, wrote “A Primer on Pennsylvania’s Participation Theory.” One of the primary benefits of organizing a business as a corporation (or similar entity) is limited liability protection. By establishing the corporation as a…

Updated:

Henry Donner recognized as Senior Statesman for Construction Law in in Chambers USA 2021 Rankings

Kang Haggerty is proud to congratulate Henry Donner, Of Counsel,  once again named the Senior Statesman for Construction Lawyers—Pennsylvania—in the 2021 edition of Chambers USA, which ranks the leading lawyers and law firms across the USA, based on in-depth market analysis and independent research. Chambers notes that Henry “has vast…

Updated:

Legal Intelligencer: Expert Witnesses in Pa.—What Materials Matter in Forming an Opinion?

Over both of counsel’s objections, the judge allowed the witness to continue with his testimony, in accordance with Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence 702 and 703 and the general acceptance test. This scenario raises the question: what materials can an expert witness rely on in Pennsylvania courts, which follows the Frye…