<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vizant Technologies Tag Archives &#8212; Kang Haggerty News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.khflaw.com/news/tag/vizant-technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Published By Kang Haggerty LLC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Kang Haggerty Victory:  $2.25M Judgement for Vizant Technologies</title>
		<link>https://www.khflaw.com/news/khf-victory-2-25m-judgement-vizant-technologies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kang Haggerty LLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Litigation and Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firm News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vizant Technologies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.khflaw.com/?p=4136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On March 22, 2016, Kang Haggerty client Vizant Technologies received a $2.25 million judgment in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In the case, Vizant Technologies, LLC, et al. v. Julie P. Whitechurch, et al., Vizant asserted claims for breach of contract, defamation, and tortious interference with existing and prospective [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 22, 2016, Kang Haggerty client <strong><a href="http://vizant.com/">Vizant Technologies</a></strong> received a $2.25 million judgment in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.</p>
<p>In the case, <em>Vizant Technologies, LLC, et al. v. Julie P. Whitechurch, et al.</em>, Vizant asserted claims for breach of contract, defamation, and tortious interference with existing and prospective business relationships.</p>
<p><span id="more-4136"></span>A boutique financial services corporation based in Chadds Ford, PA, Vizant also has offices in cities that include Charlotte, Seattle, Toronto and London. They do business with companies in 20 other countries, with clients that include for-profit and and nonprofit entities, including a Fortune 100 company, Temple University, and the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia.</p>
<p>Vizant was represented by Kang Haggerty attorneys <strong><a href="https://www.khflaw.com/edward-t-kang/">Edward T. Kang</a></strong>, <strong><a href="https://www.khflaw.com/gregory-h-mathews/">Gregory H. Mathews</a></strong> and Jason E. Powell.</p>
<p>The decision is available <strong><a href="http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/16d0225p.pdf">here</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">4136</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
