Archives

Philadelphia, PA (November 1, 2023): A jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Shin Da Enterprises, Inc., et al, v. Wei Xiang Yong, et al., yielded a Civil Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) judgment of more than five million dollars for violations of RICO 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) and civil conspiracy to violate RICO under 18 USC 1962(d). Continue reading ›

The Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Yegiazaryan v. Smagin affirming the Ninth Circuit’s holding and providing RICO plaintiffs with a powerful tool against debtors employing fraudulent tactics to avoid payment.

In the July 20, 2023 Edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward T. Kang wrote “Sophisticated Schemers Beware: Civil RICO Expands Creditors’ Arsenal—Part II.Continue reading ›

Recovery of several hundred thousand dollars for an oil company whose insurance claim for its oil delivery trucks damaged by flood was wrongfully denied. Edward T. Kang, Jacklyn Fetbroyt, and Gregory H. Mathews successfully prosecuted a bad faith claim against the insurance company resulting in the favorable settlement.

Settled favorably on behalf of a creditor that sued the debtor in the bankruptcy court in an adversarial action. After obtaining a favorable judgment after bench trial in the bankruptcy court, the creditor settled with the debtor

In two related “business divorce” cases filed in the Pennsylvania state court, KHF represented one of the two business owners in both defense and counterclaim against the other business owner, resulting in two favorable settlements.

Continue reading ›

Brought a federal RICO action against multiple defendants in the United States District Court for the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania. Two years after prosecuting the case in court, our client entered into a favorable settlement with the defendants. The RICO action was based on 18 U.S.C. § 1962(b), § 1962(c), and § 1962(d).
Continue reading ›

Contact Information